Predictive coding ordered despite party’s objections
The High Court has ordered disclosure to be carried out using predictive coding despite a party's objections to the use of the technology: Brown v BCA Trading Limited [2016] EWHC 1464 (Ch).
This is understood to be the first reported decision in which the English courts have approved the use of predictive coding following a contested application. A decision in February this year had endorsed the use of the technology for a large disclosure exercise, but in circumstances where the parties had already agreed on its use (Pyrrho Investments v MWB Property [2016] EWHC 256 (Ch). The present decision illustrates that the comparative costs between predictive coding and keyword searching are likely to be a significant factor in determining whether it should be ordered. It also suggests that, where there is a dispute as to whether predictive coding is appropriate, the court may take particular account of the views of the party who holds the lion's share of the documents and therefore will have the greater burden on disclosure. To read more from our litigation team, click here.
Written by Karen - HSF
- Cyber Security News
- Financial Conduct Authority News
- HM Treasury
- News
- The Institute Member Meeting - March 16, 2023
- Introducing AGENDA: The New Digital Member Publication for The Institute
- The Institute Digest 21/2/23
- The Institute Digest 14/2/23
- The Institute Digest 7/2/23
- The Institute Digest 30/1/23
- The Institute Digest 24/1/23
- The Institute Digest 16/1/23
- The Institute Digest 11/1/23
- The Institute Digest 14/12/22
- The Institute Digest 1/12/22
- The Institute Digest 23/11/22
- The Institute Digest 14/11/22
- The Institute Digest 6/11/22
- The Institute Digest 02/11/22
- The Institute Digest 27/10/22
- The Institute Digest 15/9/22
- Report on The Institute Meeting: September 2022
- The Institute Digest 7/9/22
- The Institute Digest (Bank Holiday Edition) 29/8/22
- The Institute Digest 22/8/22
- Annual Conference 2022 - Sponsor Update
- The Institute Digest 16/8/22
- The Institute Digest 12/8/22
- The Institute Digest 10/8/22
- Annual Conference 2022 - Speaker Update
- The Institute Digest 27/7/22
- The Institute Digest 22/7/22
- The Institute Digest 19/7/22
- The Institute Digest 14/7/22
- The Institute Digest 12/7/22
- Upcoming EMIR Margin Rules
- Potential reform of corporate criminal liability for economic crime
- ICO: Can you afford a data breach?
- ICA Information Sessions
- Publication of the Criminal Finances Bill 2016-17
- Managers' Transactions – Restrictions and Notification Requirements
- Implementing MLD4: Treasury consults
- Callcredit Fraud Summit
- 2017 IMLPO Annual Conference - 9th & 10th May 2017
- Serious Fraud Office secures second Deferred Prosecution Agreement
- Predictive coding ordered despite party’s objections
- MAR MONDAY
- EU extends Russian sectoral sanctions
- 2017 Member Meetings
- DOJ announces new FCPA pilot program to promote self-reporting
- OFAC issues regulations implementing new sanctions targeting Hizballah
- French anti-corruption developments: Sapin II law proposes new anti-corruption rules for businesses
- Sanctions update – creation of Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation and changes to UK financial sanctions regime
- Recent developments in Scottish and English bribery enforcement
- No Suremime-type duty of care owed directly to customer in connection with past business review
- Final ESMA Guidelines on UCITS V remuneration provisions: ESMA addresses the application of the proportionality principle under UCITS V and AIFMD
- Corporate Crime Monthly Update March 2016